Determination of tax, pertaining to the period up to Financial Year 2023-24, not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised by reason of fraud or any willful- misstatement or suppression of facts
Section 74, CGST Act
Straight from CBIC
Official source, not a summary of a summary
Full text included
Read the exact words of the law yourself
Amendment history
See what changed, and when
Free, always
No login, no paywall, no book to buy
In one line
Section 74 is the demand route where tax was evaded BY FRAUD, wilful misstatement or suppression, for periods up to FY2023-24. Penalty equals 100% of tax, reduced to 15% if paid before notice, 25% within 30 days of notice, or 50% within 30 days of the order. Order within 5 years. If fraud is not proved, it is treated as a section 73 demand.
What this means in practice
The parts that actually decide cases — the things a practitioner checks first.
The extended five-year limitation is available only if fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression is alleged AND made out – a bare assertion in the notice is the standard ground of challenge.
If the appellate authority or court finds the fraud ingredient absent, section 75(2) requires the demand to be recomputed as a section 73 demand for the normal period – the whole demand does not fall, so plan for that outcome.
Section 128A relief does NOT extend to section 74 demands, except where a 74 demand is reclassified as a 73 demand under 75(2).
Reduced penalties: 15 per cent before notice, 25 per cent within thirty days of notice, 50 per cent within thirty days of the order.
Questions people actually ask
Real questions we get on this provision, answered straight.
The notice alleges suppression only because our GSTR-3B did not match GSTR-1. Is that fraud?+
A mismatch that is visible on the department’s own portal is difficult to call suppression, since suppression means non-disclosure of facts the officer could not otherwise know. That is the argument to run, and if it succeeds section 75(2) recasts the demand as a section 73 case for the normal period.
How this provision is built
The skeleton, clause by clause — useful when a notice cites a specific sub-clause.
The exact words of the law
4,956 characters, uneditedReproduced from the CBIC text. We explain it above — but you should always be able to read it yourself.
Read the full provision+
(1) Where it appears to the proper officer that any tax has not been paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or where input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilised by reason of fraud, or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax, he shall serve notice on the person chargeable with tax which has not been so paid or which has been so short paid or to whom the refund has erroneously been made, or who has wrongly availed or utilised input tax credit, requiring him to show cause as to why he should not pay the amount specified in the notice along with interest payable thereon under section 50 and a penalty equivalent to the tax specified in the notice.
(2) The proper officer shall issue the notice under sub-section
(1) at least six months prior to the time limit specified in sub-section
(10) for issuance of order.
(3) Where a notice has been issued for any period under sub-section (1), the proper officer may serve a statement, containing the details of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised for such periods other than those covered under sub-section (1), on the person chargeable with tax.
(4) The service of statement under sub-section
(3) shall be deemed to be service of notice under sub-section
(1) of section 73, subject to the condition that the grounds relied upon in the said statement, except the ground of fraud, or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax, for periods other than those covered under subsection
(1) are the same as are mentioned in the earlier notice.
(5) The person chargeable with tax may, before service of notice under sub-section (1), pay the amount of tax along with interest payable under section 50 and a penalty equivalent to fifteen per cent. of such tax on the basis of his own ascertainment of such tax or the tax as ascertained by the proper officer and inform the proper officer in writing of such payment.
(6) The proper officer, on receipt of such information, shall not serve any notice under sub-section (1), in respect of the tax so paid or any penalty payable under the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder.
(7) Where the proper officer is of the opinion that the amount paid under sub-section
(5) falls short of the amount actually payable, he shall proceed to issue the notice as provided for in sub-section
(1) in respect of such amount which falls short of the amount actually payable.
(8) Where any person chargeable with tax under sub-section
(1) pays the said tax along with interest payable under section 50 and a penalty equivalent to twenty-five per cent. of such tax within thirty days of issue of the notice, all proceedings in respect of the said notice shall be deemed to be concluded.
(9) The proper officer shall, after considering the representation, if any, made by the person chargeable with tax, determine the amount of tax, interest and penalty due from such person and issue an order.
(10) The proper officer shall issue the order under sub-section
(9) within a period of five years from the due date for furnishing of annual return for the financial year to which the tax not paid or short paid or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised relates to or within five years from the date of erroneous refund.
(11) Where any person served with an order issued under sub-section
(9) pays the tax along with interest payable thereon under section 50 and a penalty equivalent to fifty per cent. of such tax within thirty days of communication of the order, all proceedings in respect of the said notice shall be deemed to be concluded. 2 [
(12) The provisions of this section shall be applicable for determination of tax pertaining to the period up to Financial Year 2023-24.] Explanation 1 .- For the purposes of section 73 and this section,-
(i) the expression "all proceedings in respect of the said notice" shall not include proceedings under section 132 ; (ii) where the notice under the same proceedings is issued to the main person liable to pay tax and some other persons, and such proceedings against the main person have been concluded under section 73 or section 74 , the proceedings against all the persons liable to pay penalty under 1 [ sections 122 and 125 ] are deemed to be concluded. Explanation 2 .- For the purposes of this Act, the expression "suppression" shall mean non-declaration of facts or information which a taxable person is required to declare in the return, statement, report or any other document furnished under this Act or the rules made thereunder, or failure to furnish any information on being asked for, in writing, by the proper officer.
High Court cases on this section
Judgments in our index that cite this provision. Being listed does not make a case good law — it may have been appealed or distinguished since. Read it before relying on it.
M/S SRI VINAYAKA ELECTRICALS v. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
Read the judgment PDF →
SAGAR GHOSH v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE GST AND ORS
Read the judgment PDF →
STATE BANK OF INDIA v. THE COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, SLG COMMISSIONERSTE AND ORS.
Read the judgment PDF →
Tvl.Kalika Engineering and Constructions v. The State Tax officer
Read the judgment PDF →
M/s. R.R. MINERALS v. The Superintendent of CGST and Central Excise
Read the judgment PDF →
M/S POKALA MALLESWARA REDDY v. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
Read the judgment PDF →
M/s.PRINCE SEAFOODS EXPORTS v. THE STATE TAX OFFICER (ROVING SQUAD 1)
Read the judgment PDF →
M/s.PRINCE SEAFOODS EXPORTS v. THE STATE TAX OFFICER (ROVING SQUAD-1)
Read the judgment PDF →
186 more on record. Search all GST case law →
What changed, and when
The amendment trail, newest first — because the version that applies to your case depends on the period.
2022-01-01 · Substituted
39/2021-C.T.
Substituted (w.e.f. 1st January, 2022 vide Notification No. 39/2021-C.T. , dated 21st December, 2021) by s. 113 of The Finance Act, 2021 (No. 13 of 2021) dated …
date not stated · Inserted
Inserted by section 137 of The Finance Act (No. 2) Act, 2024 No. 15 of 2024 dated 16.08.2024.
Read this with
A provision rarely works alone. These are the ones it points to.
Where this comes from
Text reproduced from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, as available on 2026-09-05. The explanation and practice notes above are GSTZone’s own, written for this hub. If you spot anything out of date, tell us and we’ll fix it — this hub is checked daily against CBIC.
Reading is free. Getting it wrong isn’t.
Does this apply to your case, or not?
Reading the section is one thing. Knowing whether it bites on your facts, and what it costs if it does, is another. Send us the situation – we will tell you straight, and only take it on if we can genuinely help.
6+ years · 2,500+ GST registrations filed · Bhopal, serving all of India