Apportionment of tax and settlement of funds
IGST s.17, IGST Act
Straight from CBIC
Official source, not a summary of a summary
Full text included
Read the exact words of the law yourself
Amendment history
See what changed, and when
Free, always
No login, no paywall, no book to buy
In one line
Apportionment of the IGST collected between the Centre and the States – for supplies to unregistered persons, composition dealers and persons not entitled to credit, and for imports – and settlement of the resulting funds. It is revenue-sharing machinery, not a taxpayer obligation.
The exact words of the law
4,412 characters, uneditedReproduced from the CBIC text. We explain it above — but you should always be able to read it yourself.
Read the full provision+
(a) each of the States; and
(b) Central Government in relation to Union territories, in proportion to the total supplies made by such taxable person to each of such States or Union territories, as the case may be, in a financial year: Provided further that where the taxable person making such supplies is not identifiable, the said balance amount shall be apportioned to all States and the Central Government in proportion to the amount collected as State tax or, as the case may be, Union territory tax, by the respective State or, as the case may be, by the Central Government during the immediately preceding financial year. 1 [( 2A ) . The amount not apportioned under sub-section ( 1 ) and sub-section ( 2 ) may, for the time being, on the recommendations of the Council, be apportioned at the rate of fifty per cent. to the Central Government and fifty per cent. to the State Governments or the Union territories, as the case may be, on ad hoc basis and shall be adjusted against the amount apportioned under the said sub-sections.] ( 3 ) The provisions of sub-sections ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) relating to apportionment of integrated tax shall, mutatis mutandis, apply to the apportionment of interest, penalty and compounding amount realised in connection with the tax so apportioned. ( 4 ) Where an amount has been apportioned to the Central Government or a State Government under sub-section ( 1 ) or sub-section ( 2 ) or sub-section ( 3 ),the amount collected as integrated tax shall stand reduced by an amount equal to the amount so apportioned andthe Central Government shall transfer to the central tax account or Union territory tax account, an amount equal to the respective amounts apportioned to the Central Government and shall transfer to the State tax account of the respective States an amount equal to the amount apportioned to that State, in such manner and within such time as may be prescribed. ( 5 ) Any integrated tax apportioned to a State or, as the case may be, to the Central Government on account of a Union territory, if subsequently found to be refundable to any person and refunded to such person, shall be reduced from the amount to be apportioned u nder this section, to such State, or Central Government on account of such Union territory, in such manner and within such time as may be prescribed.
What changed, and when
The amendment trail, newest first — because the version that applies to your case depends on the period.
2019-02-01 · Insertedbys
Inserted by s. 7 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 (No. 32 of 2018) – Brought into force w.e.f. 01st February, 2019.
Where this comes from
Text reproduced from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, as available on 2026-09-05. The explanation and practice notes above are GSTZone’s own, written for this hub. If you spot anything out of date, tell us and we’ll fix it — this hub is checked daily against CBIC.
Reading is free. Getting it wrong isn’t.
Does this apply to your case, or not?
Reading the section is one thing. Knowing whether it bites on your facts, and what it costs if it does, is another. Send us the situation – we will tell you straight, and only take it on if we can genuinely help.
6+ years · 2,500+ GST registrations filed · Bhopal, serving all of India